Critical Reflection of Professional Assignment Sample

Pages: 9 Words: 2239

1. Introduction: Critical Reflection of Professional

Access Free Samples Prepared by our Subject Matter Experts, known for offering the Best Assignment Help Services in Australia

I interacted with children ages 0 to 5 throughout my 30-day placement in early childhood settings, serving as a vital pre-service teacher. During the first 15 days of my employment with babies and toddlers (0–2 years old), one of my duties was to watch and comprehend the youngest students' developmental requirements. After that, I switched to a 15-day placement with children in the 3-5 age range, where my main goal was to design lessons that were appropriate for their developmental stage. During the entire process, I was responsible for putting into practise research-backed teaching techniques, creating a caring atmosphere, and regularly reviewing my methods in order to improve the standard of early childhood education. This reflection report will focus on certain facets of my teaching experiences and the ways in which the act of reflecting has advanced my career development and that will be done by using Gibbs reflective cycle.

2. Importance of the reflection process

For pre-service teachers, the reflective process is crucial since it is an active instrument for professional growth, teaching, and ongoing improvement. Such reflection is especially important in the early childhood education environment since it is consistent with the Australian Professional Teachers' Standards and the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF).

Through reflection, pre-service teachers may examine their relationships, tactics, and classroom dynamics critically(Bradbury, Fitzgerald and O’Connor, 2020). They can better understand the varied demands of young learners by reflecting on their own experiences and adjusting their methods accordingly (Hansen et al., 2012). Pre-service teachers can evaluate how well their interpersonal connections with children are working to create a pleasant and supportive learning environment by reflecting on the importance of responsive and reciprocal interactions, which is emphasised in the Early Years Learning Framework. The Australian Professional Teachers’ Standards also stress how crucial it is to modify teaching strategies to meet the requirements of specific students(Roberts, 2016). Through reflection, pre-service teachers can evaluate how their teaching strategies affect the developmental phases of children aged 0 to 5. They may pinpoint their areas of strength and progress through this iterative approach, which is in line with the standards' emphasis on professional development. Incorporating research-based instructional techniques is another benefit of reflective practises. Pre-service teachers can assess the effectiveness of strategies used and modify their ways as they reflect on their experiences. This is in line with the Australian Professional Teachers' Standards' emphasis on effective pedagogical practises and the EYLF's emphasis on play-based learning(Machost and Stains, 2023).

3. Guiding questions for main reflection

Description

I used reflective teaching throughout my GDECE104 placement by keeping a diary of my experiences, observations, and interactions with kids in the 0–5 age range. I set aside time every day to record significant events, difficulties encountered, and the efficacy of the instructional techniques used. I was able to review and evaluate my practises through journaling, bringing them into compliance with the tenets of the Australian Professional Teachers' Standards and the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) (McNally et al., 2005). In addition, I held conversations with peers and mentor teachers to get their opinions on my teaching strategies. This group reflection produced a constructive learning atmosphere and offered a range of viewpoints for personal development. Through regular reflection on my experiences, I was able to pinpoint my areas of weakness, modify my pedagogical approaches, and improve my capacity to cater to the developmental requirements of young students—all of which contributed to a more effective and flexible teaching style (Channell and Channell, 2023).

Feelings

Throughout my GDECE104 placement, I felt I was able to obtain deep understanding of the requirements of young children's development as well as the effectiveness of my teaching methods through daily reflections. As it relates to the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF), I realised how important it is to create connections that are reciprocal and responsive. Through my daily observations, I was able to evaluate these relationships and make sure they matched the EYLF's focus on polite and encouraging interactions. Additionally, daily reflections demonstrated the need of customising educational practises to meet the requirements of each individual student in accordance with the Australian Professional Teachers' Standards (Brandenburg et al., 2017). In order to make sure my teaching methods were inclusive and differentiated, I identified areas for improvement. I reaffirmed my dedication to evidence-based practises by thinking back on my day-to-day experiences. This aligned with the standards' emphasis on professional development and ongoing improvement of teaching methods to cater to the different needs of students aged 0 to 5 (Montessori Academy Childcare, 2022).

Evaluation

During my 30-day early childhood placement I evaluated that, I had the opportunity to reflect on the practises of my mentor teachers, which gave me important insights into successful teaching strategies for children ages 0 to 5. I saw the need of deliberate teaching methods that addressed the many developmental phases of young learners in relation to the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF). My mentor teachers stressed the value of play-based learning, which is consistent with the EYLF's tenets of involving kids in fulfilling activities to foster holistic development. Furthermore, by seeing mentor teachers in action and learning from their experience in fostering inclusive and encouraging learning environments, I was able to make a connection between myself and the Australian Professional Teachers’ Standards. The standards' emphasis on meeting the needs of diverse students was reinforced by their capacity to differentiate education and adjust to individual needs. I improved my capacity to deliver high-quality early childhood education by incorporating these successful practises into my teaching repertoire via reflective examination of these mentorship experiences(Allen et al., 2015).

Analysis

During my 30-day early childhood placement, I analysed the responses and learning outcomes of children ages 0 to 5, and this reflection gave me valuable insights on how to modify my teaching style. In keeping with the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF), I discovered how crucial it is to pay attention to and react to the cues and interests of young children. I could determine how engaged they were and modify the exercises to better fit their developmental stages by seeing how they reacted. This reflection approach, which was linked to the Australian Professional Teachers' Standards, emphasised the need of evaluating and summarising student learning. I was able to match my practises with the standards' emphasis on utilising evidence to influence teaching tactics by measuring the children's learning results. By modifying my teaching strategies in light of these observations, I was able to create more meaningful and developmentally appropriate learning experiences for the wide range of age groups in the 0–5 range. Also, I analysed, I significantly improved my teaching practises throughout my 30-day early childhood placement by using the reflective approach. I saw that increasing the amount of tactile and sensory activities improved learning results and increased engagement in the setting of the 0–2-year-old placement. This modification complied with the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF), which highlights how crucial it is to provide babies and toddlers with surroundings that are engaging and adaptable. My thoughts throughout the placement with children ages three to five improved the way the learning activities were designed. I saw that the kids were more engaged and enthusiastic when we used more play-based and inquiry-driven teaching strategies. This modification, which emphasised the value of purposeful teaching and the development of welcoming and encouraging learning environments, was in line with both the EYLF and the Australian Professional Teachers' Standards. In addition, these insights helped me to improve the way I communicate, which has resulted in more precise instructions and a more successful interaction with the various demands of every age group. The children's learning experience was made more enriching by this iterative process of reflection and improvement, and it also helped me grow as a pre-service teacher, which is in line with the standards' emphasis on ongoing professional development(Krieg, 2011).

Conclusion

To conclude, without a doubt, my GDECE104 placement gave me a lot of opportunity to think on myself and helped me see some of the shortcomings in my teaching methods. One significant area where I made progress was in my early struggle to successfully differentiate instruction for the diversity of requirements in the 0–5 age group. Upon observation and contemplation, this deficiency became evident, particularly when taking into account the children's varied developmental stages. I also realised that I needed to improve my capacity to move between age groups more smoothly because the teaching methods for children ages 0–2 and children ages 3-5 call for different approaches. My early encounters made clear how crucial it is to be adaptive and flexible in order to meet the distinct developmental milestones and learning preferences of various age groups. Finding these flaws became an essential part of my reflective process, which motivated me to look for further advice, participate in professional development, and improve my teaching techniques. In line with the teaching profession's concept of constant development and learning, acknowledging these areas for improvement is essential to my continued journey as a pre-service teacher. My classroom management abilities have improved greatly as a result of my placement in GDECE 104. At first, it was difficult for me to create routines that worked and to handle the different demands of kids ages 0 to 5. I developed my classroom management skills by identifying areas for improvement and putting them into practise with the help of mentor teachers and daily reflections. I discovered how crucial it is to maintain a steady and regular atmosphere in order to facilitate the development of routines throughout the 0–2-year-old placement. This was in line with the Early Years Learning Framework, which placed a strong focus on building safe and courteous interactions. When I moved to the 3–5 age group, I improved my ability to provide directions that are both age- and developmentally appropriate and to create a cooperative, happy learning environment. In addition, I learnt to modify my approach in accordance with the distinct developmental phases of each age group and created proactive measures to avoid behavioural problems. The experience gave me important new perspectives on how important it is to communicate in a courteous and responsive manner in order to successfully manage a diverse early childhood classroom. Overall, these observations and the hands-on experiences I had throughout the placement helped me get better at managing the classroom(Grieshaber, 2010).

Action plan

Over my GDECE104 placement, I have seen a considerable improvement in my classroom management abilities. Through ongoing introspection and practical experience, I've developed insights into practical methods for creating a supportive learning environment for kids in the 0–5 age range.

Action Plan for Further Improvement:

Area for Improvement	Action Steps	Timeline for Implementation
Establishing Routines	Develop a consistent daily schedule with clear routines.	Weeks 1-2 of the next placement
Transition Management	Implement transition activities to ease age group shifts.	Weeks 3-4 of the next placement
Behavioural Expectations	Create visual cues for behavioural expectations.	Throughout the next placement
Proactive Behaviour Strategies	Attend professional development on positive behaviour reinforcement techniques.	During semester break
Communication Skills with Children	Practice using age-appropriate language and effective communication techniques.	Ongoing throughout next semester

These measures are intended to address particular areas that have been recognised as needing improvement. I want to improve my classroom management skills even more by creating routines that are clear, handling transitions skilfully, defining behavioural expectations, using proactive tactics, and honing my communication talents. The Early Years Learning Framework and the Australian Professional Teachers' Standards will be complied with if these steps are progressively implemented throughout the course of the next placement and semester. This will offer a planned approach to ongoing improvement.

Conclusion

Ultimately, my 30-day experience working in early childhood settings gave me significant knowledge about the challenges of educating young children. I recognised and corrected flaws in my teaching strategies using reflective practises that were in line with the Early Years Learning Framework and the Australian Professional Teachers' Standards. My flexibility, comprehension of various developmental requirements, and classroom management abilities were all improved by the experience. My action plan's future goals are to further improve these elements in order to give young students access to a more encouraging and stimulating learning environment.

References

Allen, L., Kelly, B.B., Children, Y.B.O. and Families, 2015. Transforming the Workforce for Children Birth Through Age 8. [online] National Academies Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.17226/19401.

Anon 2022. Montessori & EYLF | Montessori Academy Childcare. [online] Montessori Academy. Available at: <https://montessoriacademy.com.au/montessori-eylf/>.

Bradbury, O., Fitzgerald, A. and O’Connor, J., 2020. Supporting Pre-Service Teachers in Becoming Reflective Practitioners Using Conversation and Professional Standards. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, [online] 45(10), pp.18–34. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n10.2.

Brandenburg, R., Glasswell, K., Jones, M. and Ryan, J., 2017. Reflective Theory and Practice in Teacher Education. Springer.

Channell, M. and Channell, M., 2023. Gibbs Reflective Cycle – A Practical Guide. [online] TSW Training. Available at: <https://www.tsw.co.uk/blog/leadership-and-management/gibbs-reflective-cycle/>.

Grieshaber, S., 2010. Departures from Tradition: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, [online] 4(2), pp.33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/2288-6729-4-2-33.

Hansen, A., Copping, A., Clough, N., Pezet, M., Dudley, P., Murtagh, L., Gowing, E., Davenport, H. and McVittie, E., 2012. Reflective Learning and Teaching in Primary Schools. Learning Matters.

Krieg, S., 2011. The Australian Early Years Learning Framework: Learning What? Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, [online] 12(1), pp.46–55. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2011.12.1.46.

Machost, H. and Stains, M., 2023. Reflective Practices in Education: A Primer for Practitioners. CBE—Life Sciences Education, [online] 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-07-0148.

McNally, J., I’anson, J., Whewell, C. and Wilson, G., 2005. ‘They think that swearing is okay’: first lessons in behaviour management. Journal of Education for Teaching, [online] 31(3), pp.169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470500169006.

Roberts, P., 2016. Reflection: A Renewed and Practical Focus for an Existing Problem in Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, [online] 41(7), pp.19–35. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n7.2.