Introduction
The Central Park Five was wrongly convicted in 1989 in a high profile case in one of five New York City teenagers who had been found on the brink of conviction as a result of brooding aimed confessions secured in police interreges (Nypl.org.2023). The absence of physical evidence and the inconsistency of their statements could not stop the words with colossal weight in court. To their credit, they have had the DNA evidence exonerate them many years later when the actual culprit to the crime relieved by him after having confessed the crime (Sarsten Polito, 2022). The case shows an appalling reality in the field of forensic psychology; the guilty would falsely confess of having committed a crime in which they never had.
False confession occurs when the suspect admits to a crime to which/he had no relation and in most instances he had misgivings towards other ethos or interrogation practices being false. It is a phenomenon that is crucial to the field of forensic psychology, as confessions are the most convincing to juries and, they may cause a direct miscarriage of justice (Ridley, 2025). The intricacy of the situations under which false confessions are used makes a psychologist perceive the possibility and control the operations of legal professional agents and moderates the transformation of the practice in the investigation sector.
This essay shows an opinion that false confessions are subjected to pressure that may be intellectual and circumstantial. It will reduce to two robust paradigms of Kassin and Wrightsman of false confessions taxonomy and Gudjonsson theory of suggestibility when it comes to answering the question of why a false confession has taken place and the consequences they entail in the justice system.
Students exploring forensic psychology, human behaviour and psychological theories can refer to Best Assignment Help Australia for academic guidance on understanding complex concepts and structuring their assignments.
Discussion
Role of psychology in understanding false confessions
Psychology is also very important in explaining the reason as to why individuals would confess to crimes which they did not commit (Catlin et al.2024). It is rather not a secret that a confession, by virtue of as much, can be said to be viewed as, the gold standard of evidence, when it comes to criminal proceedings, however, evidence suggested via psychological studies, have revealed that even when it comes to criminal proceedings, cognitive, emotional, and, situational pressures can significantly affect said confessions (Scherr et al.2020). The wrong individual would be easily vulnerable to confessing due to such factors as fatigue, harassment, direct feeling or the desire to escape the long and demanding interrogation. Without a psychological study and its harmful convictions may be obtained.
Forensic psychology studies have had enormous contributions to the research about the methods of interviewing (Thielgen et al.2022). As an example of the whether judgement it can refer to the findings of other experiments relating to the comparability of accusation, such as the Reid model; and to the evaluative techniques such as the PEACE model, which have shown how the interview techniques can at most enhance the decision the cause of potential flaws, or minimize them to their lowest effects (Catlin et al.2024). The results are applied against reforms to help foster practices that do not focus too much on the aspect of coercion but are, instead, based on evidence through questioning.
Forensic psychologists assist in the courtroom in shedding light on the facets of psychology, which may result in unreliable confessions to the juries and the judges. And, lastly, the psychologists unravel the mystery of the inability to somehow make every confession useful by simply presenting the shortcomings of the segment of youth, and the low-intelligence group or the highly suggestible group of youth (Thebritishacademy.ac.uk, 2023). This wisdom empowers the mechanization of justice because it ensures that the research and decision are benefitted by psychological science.
Factor/ theory 1: Kassin and Wrightsman’s Taxonomy of false confessions
One of the most popular frameworks is that of Kassin and Wrightsman (1985) who come up with three forms of false confessions. With the help of this taxonomy, one can have a foundation on the bases of which the psychological processes that made the individuals accept the fact of their guilt can be comprehended.
Voluntary confessions
Voluntary false confessions do not include the pressure on the part of authorities. The reasons why people can confess are due to desiring fame, guilt that is not related to the crime or protection (Lackey, 2020). It is these less prominent instances that matter in order to point to the aspect since the internal motives can all too easily pass the virtue of facts.
Coerced compliant confessions
The most frequent of them is where suspects succumb to the pressure during the interrogations. Coerced-complaint confessions: The confessions obtained under compulsion in a bid to win a person a lengthy day of investigation, or due to what appears, or what are even perceived to be threats or as a means of relief in provisional plans, where the expert knows she is not at fault.
Coerced internalized confessions
In other instances, it turns out that the suspects will eventually come to the conclusion that they have committed the crime after a few times of being hinted or put into use. This institutionalized peace with confessions is the power of a personal weakness and power to pervert memory and self-identity and, by extension, to create the belief in people about some twisted histories.
Application to the central part five
The confessions of the Central park five indicate that the process of confessions is either coerced or coerced-internalized. By being put through hours of grueling interrogation, the teenagers confessed themselves to the crimes that they did not commit, sometimes leaving out adding very few details as hinted by the police (Farrugia, 2025). Whereas some individuals came up trying to abscond themselves of the episode (coerced-compliant), there were others who appeared to borrow portions of the fake narrative and make them appear as the fact (coerced-internalized).
Critical evaluation
The taxonomy applies to distinguishing and differentiating false confusion pathways and the Fortress of forensic psychology. But it can make the interactions, which are often complex, among the pressures of the situation, personality traits and development simple (Gaines, & Lowrey-Kinberg, 2020). The real life situations tend to be more circuitous, hence, suggesting that nothing can take place as orderly as a fall of confessions under one group.
Factor/ theory 2: Gudjonsson’s suggestibility theory
The Suggestibility Theory of Gudjonsson provides a fresh avenue with which the way that people have been influenced to accept any false information at the expense of the interrogation process can be understood. The degree to which people believe in and take false or suggestive information can be suggestible and this is particularly when people are under pressure or stress due to the influence of authority (Gudjonsson, & Young, 2021). This can result in the factually inaccurate confessions being taken by the investigator which (due to the conditions of the interrogation) he/she would believe to be factual.
Psychological vulnerabilities
Suggestibility is especially susceptible in some groups. Youth, e.g. are not generally mentally mature not to accede in fact to authority and are also incapable of reflecting long-term. When questions contain inconsistency, low IQ people or those with learning problems can be in a position of not formulating the same (Gudjonsson et al.2022). Such emotional conditions like high levels of anxiety, exhaustion, and simply wish to impress an authority figure increase the level of the risk. A combination of such weaknesses predetermines the designer-ability of hijacks in regard to the fact that a suspect is being used to complete fabricated information, on being interrogated.
Application to Brendon dassey
This theory is reflected in Brendan Dassey in the case of 2005. Neuropsychological: Dassey replied by giving a series of interviews where he admits that, being a 16 year old and having an intellectual retardation he committed the act of murder (Nirider et al.2019). The use of isotope questions was also interspersed, in which the probing skills had become increasingly invasive, stretching information being churned into his case by methods of high speed in securing. The fact that Brendan surrendered to being submissive and repeating ideas acted as high interrogative suggestibility and was consistent with the model of Gudjonsson.
Critical evaluation
The research Opinion theory by Gudjonsson can be reinforced by the experimental study particularly on Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale which identifies the response or reaction of the participants to leading questions and prompting. It is empirical justification of the expertise of confession vulnerabilities. However, readers of these criticisms have condemned that testing in a lab could be in no way the same intensity, or high stakes of a police interrogating emergency as what the real scenario presents (Gudjonsson, 2021). Despite this limitation, the theory remains a valuable tool to measure the effects of personal risk factors and to give expert evidence at court.
Legal implications
Explaining vulnerabilities in Court
The forensic psychologists will come in handy in helping to explain the vulnerability of the psychologically oriented individuals to give false confessions to the judges and the jury (Welner et al.2025). By adeptly applying different taxonomy theories (such as the one suggested by Kassin and Wrightsman) and suggestibility models (such as the concept of suggestibility proposed by Gudjonsson), psychologists can find rationale behind certain suspects yielding better to confensing than others, particularly when being questioned by the younger age (or where there is mental freedom).
Risks of wrongful convictions
Because the persuasiveness of confessions impresses the jurors significantly, it is the enthusiasm of the forensic psychologists to mark that such statements may be untrue. Orchestrating wrongful convictions, prosecutions, as shown in the cases of the Central Park five, must not suppose the confession cannot be challenged, but must assess its packet-sacks (Hession, 2020).
Advising on interrogation reforms
Psychologists will also be sought, in order to propose methods of refining investigative procedures. The reforms have the ability to encompass the enforcement of video taping of interrogations, limitations to the interrogation time, and presentation of PEACE model that is not emphasized on the use of coercion but collection of information.
Linking back to case studies
By psychological evidence giving the courts correct information in cases like those with Brendan Dassey or Central Park five, jurors would have challenged the admissibility of the involved statements and be knowledgeable of the dire situations that led to the admission of such evidence.
Students interested in psychological vulnerabilities, suggestibility and human behaviour in criminal investigations can explore Psychology Assignment Help for further academic guidance on psychological concepts and research.
Conclusion
False confessions refer to confessions obtained whilst being subjected to recognizability by the human psyche, and in the majority of such cases the wrong conviction has justified the guiltlessness of an innocent person. In the taxonomy made by Kassin and Wrightsman, the routes are portrayed, and the suspects may confess falsely, such as giving in under the pressure and inculcation of the belief. The Suggestibility Theory by Gudjonsson also expounds that an individual is highly susceptible to obtaining false information during the interrogation process on the basis of age, intellectual deficits or anxiety. Together, the frameworks have pointed to the value of recognising the pressing circumstances and individual variations that ensue to play out to interpret confession evidence. Their role in reconstituting the police practice, guiding the cases through the court and safeguarding their own justice is significant to psychology. Last but not least, the issue of false confessions is not only hazardous in terms of violating rights of people, but the entire justice framework is at risk since safety and authority are also at stake.
Reference List
- Catlin, M., Wilson, D. B., Redlich, A. D., Bettens, T., Meissner, C. A., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. E. (2024). Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A systematic review update and extension. Campbell systematic reviews, 20(4), e1441.Retrieved from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/cl2.1441 [Retrieved on: 27.08.25]
- Farrugia, L. (2025). False Confessions: A Study Space Analysis. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. Retrieved from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bsl.70008 [Retrieved on: 27.08.25]
- Gaines, P., & Lowrey-Kinberg, B. (2020). False confessors. The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, 127.Retrieved from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=XA0HEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA127&dq=Kassin+and+Wrightsman%E2%80%99s+Taxonomy+of+false+confessions+&ots=sV5co4UaWb&sig=gQLiNFYlN1Bu3mF9fHgkX0w45ak [Retrieved on: 27.08.25]
- Gudjonsson, G. H. (2021). The science-based pathways to understanding false confessions and wrongful convictions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 633936. Retrieved from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633936/full [Retrieved on: 27.08.25]
- Gudjonsson, G., & Young, S. (2021). An investigation of ‘don't know’and ‘direct explanation’response styles on the Gudjonsson suggestibility scale: A comparison of three different vulnerable adult groups. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110385. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886920305766 [Retrieved on: 27.08.25]
- Gudjonsson, G., Vagni, M., Maiorano, T., Giostra, V., & Pajardi, D. (2022). The relative impact of different ‘resistant behavioural responses’ on interrogative suggestibility in children: The powerful contribution of ‘direct explanation’replies to unanswerable questions. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 19(1), 3-19.Retrieved from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jip.1581 [Retrieved on: 27.08.25]
- Hession, F. M. (2020). Constructing Guilt, Obstructing Truth: How the Spectacle of Wrongful Conviction Reveals and Magnifies Fundamental Flaws in the Criminal Justice System. Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1290&context=senproj_s2020 [Retrieved on: 27.08.25]
- Lackey, J. (2020). False Confessions and Testimonial Injstice. J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 110, 43. Retrieved from: https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/jclc110§ion=8 [Retrieved on: 27.08.25]
- Nirider, L. H., Dvorak, R. J., Halling, S. A. D., Cayo, S. C., Waxman, S. P., Hale, W. C. P., & Dorr, L. L. P. (2019). BRENDAN RAY DASSEY. Retrieved from: https://wwws.law.northwestern.edu/legalclinic/wrongfulconvictionsyouth/documents/brendan-dassey-petition-for-executive-clemency.pdf [Retrieved on: 27.08.25]
- Ridley, A. D. M. (2025). The Historical Criminalization of Black Masculinity Towards a Social Disability: The New York City Newspapers and the Central Park Five (Doctoral dissertation, Drew University).Retrieved from: https://search.proquest.com/openview/7926122fa639b669a4b5101a36f3b65c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y [Retrieved on: 27.08.25]
- Sarsten Polito, M. (2022). REFORMING THE METHODS USED FOR OBTAINING JUVENILE CONFESSIONS. Barry Law Review, 27(1), 141-161. Retrieved from: https://lawpublications.barry.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1191&context=barrylrev [Retrieved on: 27.08.25]
- Scherr, K. C., Redlich, A. D., & Kassin, S. M. (2020). Cumulative disadvantage: A psychological framework for understanding how innocence can lead to confession, wrongful conviction, and beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 353-383.Retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1745691619896608 [Retrieved on: 27.08.25]
- Thielgen, M. M., Schade, S., & Niegisch, P. (2022). Police officers’ interrogation expertise and major objectives in police service and training: A comprehensive overview of the literature. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 823179.Retrieved from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823179/full [Retrieved on: 27.08.25]
- Welner, M., DeLisi, M., & Janusewski, T. (2025). False confessions: An integrative review of the phenomenon. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 43(2), 185-202. Retrieved from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bsl.2707 [Retrieved on: 27.08.25]
- The Exonerated Five: An In-Depth Look at Their Journey to Justice | The New York Public Library. (2023). The New York Public Library. Available at: https://www.nypl.org/blog/2023/02/01/exonerated-five-depth-look-their-journey-justice [Accessed on: 27.08.25]
- Edinburgh Research Explorer Legal aspects of memory. (2023). Legal aspects of memory: a report issued by the Psychology and Law Sections of the British Academy Available at: https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/4750/JBA-11-p095-Baddeley-et-al.pdf [Accessed on: 27.08.25]
