Tactical fit and Marketing fit
a) Supply Chain Structure Announcement of the Current Supply Chain Structure
Mahindra Logistics Ltd (MLL) is a third party logistics services company (3PL) and consequently; its main business is to extend the service of the logistics (lots of it) to the logistics in other organizations against keeping all logistics under the umbrella of the Company (Roy, 2023). The MLL supply chain is broad because it serve its customers in broad sectors that encompass automotive, FMCG, e-commerce and pharmaceutical.
Students exploring business operations and strategic management concepts can access relevant academic resources through our best assignment help Australia platform.
The supply chain structure begins with the clients and their suppliers. MLL can be applied to the automotive industry to ship raw materials and finished components of an auto vehicle between the dealership, factory and the supplier. Concerning the FMCG, it helps to deliver food and packaged goods prior to their distributional points and outlets (Anusha et al. 2022). MLL also provides service of delivery in e-commerce which means that it collects items and delivers them to the customers who were picked at sellers in e-commerce. Just like in the scenario of pharma, the business facilitates transportation of temperature controlled and safe storage of medicines.
MLL operates as a hub and-spoke. The reason is that big regional sizes are typically central hubs where merchandise is collected, assembled before being shipped off. So that smaller warehouses can serve smaller regions. The design helps in optimization of transport routes, cost-savings, and more customers.
The second significant feature of the supply chain at MLL is that it is asset-light. In other words, MLL does not contain as many trucks and warehouses as other conventional logistics companies. It also engages heavily in subcontracted flotillas and common warehouses (Prejith,, 2025). The model helps it to expand or shrink business without necessarily traveling long distances spending a lot of money on fixed assets as a reaction to the client need. On the one hand, this brings with it a source of flexibility but on the other hand, there is the need to closely coordinate the actions of MLL with its partners and clients.
MLL has also invested online system such as LogiOne. Using these platforms, the firm will be able to trace products, create paths, and inform other customers. However, other times the process is not as smooth as it may be based on the gaps in the real-time visibility and bad connection with client systems. In general, MLL possesses supply chain design that is both fiberable, cost-effective, and distant, in approach, to gain a number of different spheres, but it involves a substantial level of integration of additional platforms.
b) Customer Value Proposition
Customer value proposition is about describing the pledge that MLL makes to its customers through its services. In the case of MLL, the value chain is centered on reliability, cost-efficiency, digital solutions and flexibility.
Reliability Clients are confident that MLL will deliver goods on a timely basis and in good quality (Jain & Rawani, 2022). In some other industries such as the automotive and the pharma, reliability is a key consideration as any delays will lead to halt in production or even endanger the lives of patients.
Economical cost: Since MLL operates under asset-light model it is set to deliver logistics services at a low cost than those that normal companies that carry huge fixed assets. Clients who would desire competitive prices are tempted to this.
Flexibility: MLL is applicable in a number of industries; therefore, it self customizes its services to tailor to requirements of the industry. It, for example, provides last-mile logistics to e-commerce, just-in-time or pharma temperature-controlled storage, and last-mile logistics to auto OEMs.
Online solutions: MLL points out its online solutions such as the LogiOne to offer transparency, monitoring and reporting (Gakhreja & Thakur, 2024). Although there are discrepancies between integration, marketing focuses on the benefits as one of the advantages of this innovation.
Overall, the customer value proposition as presented by MLL includes being a dependable, inexpensive, adaptable and Tech Company. The message is intended to appeal to large and small OEMs and retail and e-commerce clients.
c) Evaluation of Strategic Fit among Supply Chain, Marketing
In corporate success, the marketing assurances should be provided by the supply chain capacities. When it comes to MLL, there is a broad parallelism with gaps.
The marketing is aimed at marketing MLL as an online, agile, and efficient logistics company. This promise is supported by the supply chain structure due to the broadness of reachability through the hub-and-spoke framework and the capacity to scale up or down the operation through the asset-light approach (Ovungal, 2024). The agreements with fleets and warehouses help MLL to reach much number of clients without making very big investments to substantiate the argument about cost effectiveness.
However, some gaps exist. In a given instance, marketing stresses on digital visibility, and integration, yet, in some cases, the marketing operational systems fail to provide visibility in real-time in the entire network. Since most of the fleets will be contracted, they will not always integrate well with their systems. This can create issues when the customers are supposed to receive real-time updates only to be delayed.
Still another issue is profitability. Marketing will tend to focus on serving sectors with rapid growth such as e-commerce (Nair & Babu, 2025). But, as illustrated in profitability analysis below, provision of e-commerce services comes at lower margins since the cost of last-mile delivery is extremely high. In case the supply chain fails to maintain marketing promises made without extra expenditure, then misalignment occurs.
Nevertheless, MLL has performed moderately well in terms of alignment in factors such as reliability with automotive customers and adaptable models with FMCG. The ultimate solution to the company is to invest more on system integration and margin based services in such a way that the supply chain can deliver complete support to what the company claims in its marketing.
d) Supply Chain Decisions Phases and Market Oriented Orientation.
In the case of Supply Chain, business operates in three phases of decisions that include, strategy, planning, and operations.
Strategy phase: During this stage, MLL determines the design of its network and business model in general. The decision is strategic to pursue an asset-light model. The purchase of express business by Rivigo and the purchase of Whizzard last mile network are also strategic ones to increase coverage (Ameen, 2025). These options will address the escalating demand in e-commerce and will make the network more market-oriented.
Planning stage: Planning is the stage that relates to demand forecasting, contract management, and resource preparation. To illustrate, with the help of client data, MLL is able to predict the number of cars or warehouses required at the time of the festivals, when the interest of FMCG customers and e-commerce will be the greatest. Planning in pharma also involves compliance and safety requirements.
Operation phase: This is day -to-day implementation. It involves collecting items, sorting, transporting, storage and giving it to its end-users. These operations should be supported by digital platforms such as the LogiOne. Nevertheless, poor integration could be detrimental to efficiency.
The supply chain of MLL is evidently market driven. It customises its services to the needs of the client, rather than compelling clients to adapt to the fixed systems adopted by MLL. Similarly, automotive customers receive last-minute logistics, and e-commerce clients receive last-mile shipment (Chaudhary & Kate, 2023). The market orientation stems out of the need to ensure that MLL remains competitive in the market. The danger, however, is that too many of the various needs will strain resources and profitability unless handled properly.
Students studying logistics operations, supply chain strategies and cost optimisation can explore relevant concepts through our Supply Chain Management Assignment Help resources.
Financial and Cost Analysis
a. Description of eliminating the complexity of the “balance sheet and calculating the ROI”
| Assets | INR_million |
|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | 800 |
| Accounts Receivable | 1200 |
| Inventory (client-managed) | 600 |
| Property, Plant & Equipment | 1200 |
| Intangible (IT systems) | 200 |
| Total Assets | 4000 |
(Source: Self-created in MS Excel)
The financial position of “Mahindra Logistics Ltd (MLL)” is given using “simplified supply chain assumptions” (Varghese et al. 2023). The company has been characterized with “cash and equivalents of INR 800 million”, receivable accounts of INR 1,200 million, and client run inventories of INR 600 million. “Property, plant and equipment value” equals INR 1,200 million and intangible property equals 200million INR. These resources will lead to the “total value of assets INR 4,000m” and will be utilized in ROI estimation.
Building on the “liabilities account, short term debts and customer payables of MLL” are estimated short-term INR 2,500 million and long-term INR 700 million, which leaves approximate INR 800 million of equity.
| Customer Segment | Revenue_INR_million |
|---|---|
| Automotive (OEMs) | 3000 |
| FMCG / Retail | 1500 |
| E-commerce & 3PL | 1000 |
| Pharma & Others | 500 |
| Total Revenue | 6000 |
(Source: Self-created in MS Excel)
Through such figures, this can be used to calculate the “ROI (Return on Investment)”. As MLL has the “net profit of around INR 300 m” and the capital of the “supply chain (inventory and PP&E)” equals INR 1,800 m, the ROI of MLL will be as follows:
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Annual Demand (D) | 12000 |
| Ordering Cost (S) | 5000 |
| Holding Cost per unit (H) | 10 |
| EOQ (units) | 3464.102 |
(Source: Self-created in MS Excel)
It shows that at a particular rupee of a money invested in the “supply chain assets”, the company makes about 17 paisa’s returns. It is a healthy payment but the true figures may differ.
b. The “costs drivers of the supply chain”
The four directions of the key “supply chain costs of MLL include”:
- Transportation is half of its costs, where the most major expense is the cost of the road delivery, and it is essential because of high gas prices.
- These 10 percent is warehoused which opposed the overall cost the shared warehouses save money but still it involves a rent bill and utility bill along with the workforce (KJ, 2022).
- The 30 percent includes overheads and information technology and the 20 percent includes the cost of investments in technology and administration costs.
- Other charges are 10 percent that include insurance, compliance and other miscellaneous elements.
| Cost Component | Percent | Cost_INR_million |
|---|---|---|
| Transportation | 0.5 | 3000 |
| Warehousing | 0.1 | 600 |
| Overhead & IT | 0.3 | 1800 |
| Other (fuel, admin) | 0.1 | 600 |
| Total Costs | 1 | 6000 |
(Source: Self-created in MS Excel)
In “Total Cost Analysis”, margins can easily be affected in case there is a slight increase in the transport costs. Assuming, on average, the price per order is INR 420 and the revenue per order is INR 500, the profit will be INR 80 per order. However, using the assumption that the fuel prices increment and the price per order is set at INR 450 at that point the profit will be reduced to INR 50 and the profit margin is at a very low level.
c. Description of the “Customer Profitability Matrix”
| Customer Segment | Revenue_INR_million | Direct_SC_Cost_INR_million | Contribution_INR_million | Margin_percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automotive (OEMs) | 3000 | 1500 | 1500 | 0.5 |
| FMCG / Retail | 1500 | 900 | 600 | 0.6 |
| E-commerce & 3PL | 1000 | 800 | 200 | 0.8 |
| Pharma & Others | 500 | 300 | 200 | 0.6 |
(Source: Self-created in MS Excel)
Not all customer groups are equally profitable. A profitability matrix helps a person to look at but which groups are giving higher returns.
- Automotive (OEMs): Revenue INR 3, 000 million: “Direct costs INR 1, 500 million”: Contribution INR 1, 500 million: Margin 50%. These clients are very lucrative since it has long run contracts and demand is unwell.
- Contract Warehousing: INR 800 million Revenue, INR 400 million cost, INR 400 million contribution, and 50-percent margin.
- E-commerce INR 1,000 million income; INR 800 million direct expenses; INR 200 million contribution; INR 20 margin. This segment is not so profitable because building last miles are expensive to deliver.
- Pharma/Other: INR 500 million Revenue; INR 300 million “Direct costs”; INR 200 million Contribution and INR 40 percent Margin. Because of specificity of the services, profitability is high.
Interpretation: The automotive and FMCG clients are the most profitable, because e-commerce brings down turnover on the whole. It means that MLL should control pricing or e-commerce efficiency to achieve better balance.
d. Description of the direct product profitability
| Service | Revenue_INR_million | Direct_Cost_INR_million | Contribution_INR_million | Margin_percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed Transportation | 2500 | 1400 | 1100 | 0.56 |
| Contract Warehousing | 800 | 400 | 400 | 0.5 |
| Last-mile Express | 700 | 500 | 200 | 0.714285714 |
(Source: Self-created in MS Excel)
“Profitability of products/services” identifies the services indicating favorable returns.
Managed Transportation INR 2,500 million Revenue; INR 1,400 million Cost; INR 1,100 million Contrib; 44 Margins. Strong profitability (Rahman, 2022).
Contract Warehousing: Revenue INR 800million, cost INR 400million, contribution INR 400million and margin 50. It makes warehouses the most profitable.
Last-Mile Express: INR Revenue 700 million: INR 500 million: INR 200 million: Margin 29. Weak last-mile delivery profitability.
Interpretation: Warehousing and managed transport are the most lucrative services in the company. Last-mile services would have to expand but to achieve a higher margin, they should be improved.
Reference List
- Ameen, N. O. A STUDY ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION TOWARDS MAHINDRA SCORPIO IN CAI INDUSTRIES LTD, COIMBATORE. [Retrieve from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/No-Ameen/publication/354447504_A_STUDY_ON_CUSTOMER_SATISFACTION_TOWARDS_MAHINDRA_SCORPIO_IN_CAI_INDUSTRIES_LTD_COIMBATORE/links/6138d2cdc76de21e319f5b94/A-STUDY-ON-CUSTOMER-SATISFACTION-TOWARDS-MAHINDRA-SCORPIO-IN-CAI-INDUSTRIES-LTD-COIMBATORE.pdf] [Retrieve on: 06.09.2025]
- Anusha, K., Reddy, S., & Kumar, P. (2022). Effectiveness and efficiency of last mile operations with reference to third party logistics service provider. In Building Resilient Organizations (pp. 252-261). Routledge. [Retrieve from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003313663-20/effectiveness-efficiency-last-mile-operations-reference-third-party-logistics-service-provider-kanagala-anusha-srinivasa-reddy-pavan-kumar] [Retrieve on: 06.09.2025]
- Chaudhary, P., & Kate, N. (2023). The coalescence effect: Understanding the impact of customer value proposition, perceived benefits and climate change sensitivities on electric vehicle adoption in India. Business Strategy & Development, 6(4), 843-858. [Retrieve from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bsd2.282] [Retrieve on: 06.09.2025]
- Gakhreja, S., & Thakur, S. (2024). Competing strategies and network management in supply chain management. In Supply Chain Management (pp. 14-33). CRC Press. [Retrieve from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003509561-2/competing-strategies-network-management-supply-chain-management-bharti-shweta-gakhreja-shilpa-thakur] [Retrieve on: 06.09.2025]
- Jain, R., & Rawani, A. M. APPLICATION OF FRUGAL APPROACH FOR PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT-A CASE STUDY OF MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LTD. [Retrieve from: https://www.academia.edu/download/88946766/IJMET_13_07_005.pdf] [Retrieve on: 06.09.2025]
- KJ, A. (2022). A Study on Price image and customer satisfaction with special reference to Kerala agro machinery co-operation Ltd, Athani. [Retrieve from: http://115.242.226.198:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/683] [Retrieve on: 06.09.2025]
- Nair, S. S., & Babu, S. (2025, April). Assessing Market Penetration Potential of Mahindra BE 6e and XEV 9e: Analyzing Consumer Preferences and Adoption Factors in India's Evolving EV Landscape. In 2025 12th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. [Retrieve from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/11115791/] [Retrieve on: 06.09.2025]
- Ovungal, S. (2024). SCALING UP DIGITALISATION SOLUTIONS IN LOGISTICS: A CASE STUDY OF MAHINDRA LOGISTICS IN INDIA (Doctoral dissertation, VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY). [Retrieve from: https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstreams/dd5c8416-9de9-47d0-9286-cb841b8e6990/download] [Retrieve on: 06.09.2025]
- Prejith, P. (2025). Protection and Lowering Carbon Footprint. UNIVERSITY OF EDENBERG, 153. [Retrieve from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/G-Kumar-53/publication/395360052_Using_Ai-Powered_Wearables_to_Track_Biometric_Data_for_Enhanced_University_Football_Player_Health/links/68bfe4c46fe8e57ec8e42f78/Using-Ai-Powered-Wearables-to-Track-Biometric-Data-for-Enhanced-University-Football-Player-Health.pdf#page=167] [Retrieve on: 06.09.2025]
- Rahman, M. H. (2022). Using Marketing Mix to Introduce EICHER Brand Truck–A Study on RANGS Motors Limited. [Retrieve from: http://dspace.uiu.ac.bd/handle/52243/2591] [Retrieve on: 06.09.2025]
- Roy, D. (2023). A Truck is not a Cookie: Matching Supply with Demand at Mahindra Truck and Bus Division. Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, 1-18. [Retrieve from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CASE.IIMA.2023.000008/full/html] [Retrieve on: 06.09.2025]
- Varghese, A. M., Jayanth, R. S. S., Jacob, R. T., Srivastava, A., & Pradhan, R. P. (2023). Cracking the conundrum of e-cargo logistics: curious case of LoadExx. Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies, 13(3), 1-31. [Retrieve from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EEMCS-04-2023-0143/full/html] [Retrieve on: 06.09.2025]
5 Years | PhD
